We set up Make.com automation for teams that want a workflow built properly, with every branch and failure path planned first. Make bills per operation rather than per task and handles branching, filtering and iterating over lists natively, which makes it both the cheaper and the saner choice once a workflow has more than one path through it. The visual editor is also why a scenario is still readable a year later. The build is the easy part; what makes it worth having is the failure design — what happens when the other end times out, who finds out, and whether a webhook arriving twice creates two records.
— Make
Make.com Automation Setup & Integration
One scenario, every branch handled. The workflow that costs you an hour a week — built in Make as a visual scenario, with the routers, filters and error handlers it actually needs.
What we automate
01
Scenario design
Trigger, routers, filters and failure cases mapped before anything is built — most “automation” requests turn out to be two scenarios.
02
Two-platform integrations
Forms into Slack, CRM into email, shop orders into a spreadsheet, invoices into accounting.
03
Error handlers & retries
Real error-handler routes, rather than a scenario that stops halfway and waits for someone to notice.
04
Handover & documentation
A walkthrough and a written map of the scenario, so it is yours to change rather than ours to maintain.
— How it works
Our process.
- 01
Map the scenario
Trigger, routers, filters and error routes drawn before the build, with the operations each run will use counted against your Make.com plan.
- 02
Build in Make.com
Modules, routers and iterators in your own Make.com organisation, with HTTP modules and webhooks where an app has no ready-made module.
- 03
Test every route
Live data sent down every branch, a duplicate webhook included, to prove each route and error handler does what the map says.
- 04
Alerts & handover
Error notifications sent to a named person, plus a walkthrough and a written map of the scenario so your team can change it.
Why us for Make
- Operations counted at design time, so the bill is not a surprise
- Filters and routers placed to cut operations, not just to look tidy
- Idempotent steps, so a webhook received twice does not double up
- Tested end to end in your live environment
- If the logic outgrows no-code we say so — n8n is next door
— FAQ
Frequently asked questions
A workflow with more than one path?
Describe it and we will tell you what it takes to build it properly in Make.